Here I am and raring to go!
Westfield Comprehensive (to 77); Yeovil Tertiary College (77-9), Edinburgh University (80-4); Sussex University (90-4)… I’m old!
Science ‘A levels’; then started out in undergraduate astronomy; shifted to a masters in ‘archaeology and social anthropology’; then a doctorate (and now a prof-ship) in ‘science and technology policy’
many farms, building sites, a factory, a hospital, a care home, a museum, peace movement, prison, many archaeological digs and field surveys, Greenpeace, university, advisory committees
Research Director for SPRU (“science policy research unit”) and a Co-Director of the ‘STEPS Centre’ (www.steps-centre.org)
the University of Sussex
Me and my work
I teach, research and give policy advice on issues to do with scientific uncertainty and the politics of technologyRead more
I’m one of those scientists who morphed early into a social scientist – not sure whether that’s “poacher turned gamekeeper”, or the other way around?
I’ve since spent my working life as an activist and academic – getting stuck-in on all kinds of issues around nuclear power, weapons, toxic chemicals, gm foods, nanotechnology, neuroscience and so on…
This has lead to various adventures, anecdotes. laughs and embarrassments… Key threads thro’ all this, tho’, are challenges of uncertainty and democracy. What happens when science and technology meet political and economic power? I’m especially keen on developing practical tools and frameworks for analysing this.
This is not so much about being ‘pro’ or ‘anti’ any particular technology, but about how to choose the best directions for research and innovation?
My hopes for GM
A slightly strange question, if you think about it: technologies are means not ends. My hopes are for people and the environment, not any particular technology!Read more
In a way this question sums up a key thing that’s wrong with much of the discussion of GM. By fixating around “hopes for GM”, we get too easily polarised into ‘pro’ and ‘anti’. We miss giving due attention to the other means to address the same ends (like human wellbeing, social justice and ecological integrity).
If I were persuaded that a GM technology could really help on these scores better than other means, to improve the lot of the poorest and most vulnerable people, then I would support it. I guess this is a kind of hope…
But, as it stands, my main “hopes for GM”, are that we find a way to invest as much money, skill, attention and political support in arguably more effective (but sadly neglected) ways to tackle global food challenges (like security, injustice, and environment). I mention some of these below.
My fears for GM
GM could lead to a world where food supply is controlled by a few very powerful corporations – at the expense of environment, health, wellbeing… and other innovations.Read more
As it stands, GM technologies are driven mainly by pressures to make money by controlling ‘property rights’ in new forms of life – or by using these to sell other products like branded pesticides. For all the talk, this means that most of the effort goes into products that miss the interests of the poorest and most vulnerable folk.
Where – as is sometimes the case – particular lines of GM research are more enlightened, I find them much more interesting. But they still tend to suffer from assumptions that we can control the world by engineering it at the ‘most fundamental’ level. In fact, the real world is a much more complicated, dynamic and sensitive place. This can leaves us vulnerable to the messy uncertainties and complexities. If we deny this, we’re even more vulnerable.
The basic fear is, that a fixation with GM can crowd out other ways of doing things: giving people greater rights over their own land; allowing farmers to select and exchange their own seed; ‘open source’ plant breeding; ecological farming and so on. These don’t offer ways for business to make so much money, so – like Cinderalla – they don’t get invited to the policy party.
How would you describe yourself in 3 words?
happy, scruffy, boffy
What is your favourite film?
If you had 3 wishes for yourself what would they be? - be honest!
integrity, wellbeing, fulfillment – why waste a wish on anything less, they don’t come around too often!
What's your favourite view in the world?
Out past Cornish cliffs and over the dunes to the Atlantic
What's the best thing you've done in your career?
helped give science advice that helped reduce people’s exposure to some kinds of toxic chemicals
Ask me a question!
How does the money spent on GM research in the UK compare to that spent on other new farming techniques?
Do you think infertile GM seeds are a bad thing because even though they could help prevent contamination they would
This may sound silly but why does selective breeding and genetically modifying animals harm them?!?!?
I have many concerns about GM but the greatest are: 1. The potential effects on ecosystems by way of altering the
How can the supporters of GM technology communicate their opinion better to a wider audience rather than just those who
Quite a general question: The GM debate (in mainstream media) has been one that has spanned nearly my entire life so
Is there any common ground? What can you all agree on?
In some countries GM technology is used and there is very little opposition from the public. (Whether this is due to
As nothing in science is 100% certain, what steps can be taken to gather high quality evidence of effectiveness (or
View all my answered questions
- Are the experts biased?
- How do I register?
- Is this "fluffy pro-GM PR"?
- What can I do on this site?
- What is this site for?